"The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority."
Any particular person is chosen from the group of the people in the society and that person is given the authority for maintaining the society. So the statement contends that in order to enhance the well being of any society, the people of the society should always question the authorised mebers who have been chosen for maintenance of the society.
It is true that each and every member of the society should question the main authorized person about whether any work is perfectly and timely done or not. If the person is not asked then he may become lethargic and the work may not be done well. For example all the people of the country should from time to time ask the political persons that are being chosen by the normal public of the country for the well being of the country. Because if the person is not asked about the work then he may not do the work timely and may do corruption in some cases. So each and every political person should be quetsioned about how much work have been done by them and how had they spend the money of the people of society in doing welfare of the country. By this the growth rate of the country will increase and the political person will always be in fear before doing any wrong work like corruption, that he may be questioned by the normal public.
For another example the parents should time to time keep records of the progress report of their child by asking about this to their supervisor so in that case the teacher will always remain conscious about their child and also they would be able to get timely progress report of their child.
But somehow the questioning should be normal it should not be like that the perosn has a negative impact on his mind about this questioning. So somehow there should be restriction imposed that each and every person should not go to meet the authorized person and question him but instead of that any of the representative of the people go to meet the authorized person and have a normal talk about what kind of works are done by the person.
In conclusion the people of the society should question the authorized perosn for the enhancement of the society but the questioning should be such that it should not produce a negative impact on the person or harm the self respect of the person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-23 | harsh.dota | 50 | view |
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint. 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues."Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land wi 58
- "Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field." 50
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51573849879 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30970400086 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.36803874092 0.4932671777 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1394042099 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.416666667 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4166666667 23.4991977007 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.21951772744 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159932717252 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848643370592 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534555122141 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114426005901 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598387481401 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 12.1639044944 78% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.