What really matters in the leadership of business and organizations is getting results, reaching benchmarks and achieving success
Leadership is an art and one who excels in it becomes unbeatable in all aspects and reach apex. But acquiring eminence in such an intrinsic skill is a tedious process as it involves dealing with management on one side and team members on the other. Many leaders get ambiguous in various circumstances as they get tangled in this process of meeting both the ends. As the consequence, there is a greater possibility that the leader might push the result oriented approach to his or her counterparts. This approach may make him an ideal employee in the eyes of ascending management but never to his subordinates. Though getting results, reaching bench marks and achieving success matters for an ideal employee it is not as such for an ideal leader.
Leader who is result oriented cannot extract the dedication, willingness to perform the task and above all team spirit from his colleagues without which achieving the targets are in the horizon. To bolster the connotation of this essay, it is required to draw example from iconic movie ‘Devil wears a prada’ in which Meryl steep plays a haughty boss who never cares about those working under her but wants to get her work done. It will be portrayed as her dedication is the significant reason for the fashion magazine she works for to top the charts always. Nevertheless, she cannot retain her competent assistant more than a year. The goal driven approach which fail to gain trust from the employees never creates a person with admiring leadership. An organisation lead by such a personality cannot stay at its apogee for a long time and is sure to witness its descendant.
What matters most is the leader who appreciates the journey and not result so that the employee gets motivated to do more the next time. In this unpredictable pandemic time, the most expected attribute of people manager is empathy. Only a person with empathy can gain the faith from his own kind and develop a sense of nearness making him more approachable. This can create a harmonious working environment which can automatically bring the expected results. The outstanding quality of such a team may not be visible immediately but will do so in course of time and they can rise again even if they reach the bottom.
It is the duty of top management to assess its managers depending on the realistic leadership qualities such as knowing his people and cultivating the loyalty. Otherwise the organisation might not witness a real leader who can bring his entire team to spotlight rather than himself.
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- What really matters in the leadership of business and organizations is getting results reaching benchmarks and achieving success 75
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 58
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 11
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...agazine she works for to top the charts always. Nevertheless, she cannot retain her co...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...his people and cultivating the loyalty. Otherwise the organisation might not witness a re...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nevertheless, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88399071926 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75743298631 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529002320186 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2930516155 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.789473684 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6842105263 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.05263157895 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132497687407 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400541025733 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540462488499 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757947639963 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461537327119 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.