When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
The author suggests that the development of modern buildings is more important as compared with the old historic buildings and hence a preference should be given to modern development over the preservation of historic buildings. I would like to partially agree with the author based on the following points.
Firstly, the preservation of old historic buildings is very important for protecting history. They serve as symbols of valuable culture. An Individual after knowing about the history of his Land will make him more loyal towards it. For example, if we do not preserve the forts built at the time of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, an Indian warrior, we might not remember every detail about the struggles and worships he had while building the 'Maratha Empire'. These historical monuments link us with their historical stories which help to understand and respect people who lived in different eras. Thus, preserving the old historic buildings is everyone's duty.
In addition to that historic buildings are also beneficial as a source of income to the nation. They attract a huge number of tourists which contribute to the economic growth of the nation. It increases different job opportunities, and also develops the surrounding areas. For instance, Agra, a city in India has developed because of the Taj Mahal, one of the seven wonders of the World. Taj Mahal has huge historical value and is the biggest tourist attraction in India. Thus, preserving historic buildings not only nurture historical believes but also benefits the nation.
In contrast to that, if one has to choose between modern development and the preservation of historic buildings, the needs of the nation's people should be taken into consideration. We all have learned that food, cloth, and shelter are the three basic needs of any human being. If these needs are not fulfilling, preferring modern development over the preservation of historic buildings is justifiable. For instance, in a poor country like Pakistan where the infrastructure is not much developed, instead of protecting these old blocks of buildings it's important to provide proper shelter to the country people. Thus, preferring modern development over the preservation of the historic building is situation dependent.
In conclusion, the preservation of old historic buildings is important, but if the basic needs of the nation's people are not satisfying then modern development has to be given precedence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-29 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | swetha_14r | 54 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Teyyub | 50 | view |
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons and or examples that could be used to challenge your position Critical 16
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate 66
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 70
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyse the trends of its youth 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...c buildings not only nurture historical believes but also benefits the nation. In contr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...f the basic needs of the nations people are not satisfying then modern development has to be given...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31362467866 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94672194384 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506426735219 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.07645429 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.35 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40047500341 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131984586172 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14084407372 0.0758088955206 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267024670934 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10815517946 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.