Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which the claim is based.
Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
The claim that when planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students seems to be correct, but the reason that the students will be more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying seems to be not abiding by the claim.
The claim presented by the author is passable, as the students' suggestions should be taken into account while planning the courses. The students are the one who are going to go through the rigorous tests and assignments throughout the learning process. For instance, In any professional course such as Engineering, during the final year, the students are given choices to select subjects of there choice from a pool of subject according to their interests. Thus, the students are also happy as they get to learn the subject of their choice and also have a satisfaction that their opinion is also taken into consideration while designing the course.
This does give them a motivation to learn as they get to study what they are interested in, but this case is not applicable everywhere and could not be generalized to all students. As mentioned before this option of electives is given to only the final year students. The students of lower classes are just neophytes and don't know what in whole the course is about. Thus, taking their opinion into consideration would lead to loss of their own, as their suggestions would be in line to their previous experiences till then which are lacking the basic knowledge of the course. In this case, the suggestions of experienced educators are more beneficial, than that of the students, hence will be better if remain unaltered by those of students.
Furthermore, the reason presented that Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying does not abide by the claim, as the claim states that when planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students. For instance, if a student gives a suggestion so as to eliminate a subject from the curriculum just because he has heard from someone that it is difficult. Also, the educators assert to his suggestion. But it is after the student starts learning the course, he will get to know whether he is interested in it or getting motivated to study it. Thus, planning the course with the students' opinions to some extent will help to make the course better. But will not guarantee that the course will motivate and draw the students' interest.
Thus, the author's claim seems to be partially correct and so the reason presented for it. Additionally, the reason given is also not correctly explaining the claim. Hence, when planning courses, educators should not always take into account the interests and suggestions of their students, as it is not necessary that doing so will motivate the students to study the course or be interested in it.
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 67
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which the claim is based Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 51
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather t 53
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine In 1975 a wildlife ce 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nto account while planning the courses. The students are the one who are going to g...
^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uld not be generalized to all students. As mentioned before this option of electiv...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...of lower classes are just neophytes and dont know what in whole the course is about....
^^^^
Line 4, column 335, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...stance, if a student gives a suggestion so as to eliminate a subject from the curriculum...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, thus, while, as to, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2424.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92682926829 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68074252053 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.386178861789 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1401883926 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.578947368 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8947368421 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33203537591 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110172279564 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100853759409 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224376435516 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817150176396 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.