Zoos are still a fixture in man big cities functioning as a place of interest for both tourists and scientists Do you think the existence of zoos in urban centers is still relevant

Over recent years, a range of zoos has been built to meet the certain need of the entertainment industry for both tourists and scientists in many big cities. Despite the common belief that zoos do wonders for our life, other criticisms emphasized their radical downsides. In my opinion, the existence of zoos in urban centers isn’t relevant anymore.

Firstly, many people think zoos provide educational opportunities for children to learn and have a practical experience to see wild animals right in the urban. But there is no reason that zoos educate people about the importance of conservation. Most visitors spend only a few minutes at each display, seeking entertainment rather than enlightenment. For example, over the course of five summers, a curator at the National Zoo followed more than 700 zoo visitors and found that “it didn’t matter what was on display, people were treating the exhibits like wallpaper.” Furthermore, many visiting zoos don’t send the right message to children about wildlife conservation and animal ethics or even make children have a negative attitude about the way of treating wild animals. Because many zoos train animals cruelly to force them to dance, draw, etc... to attract visitors, and if they cannot do that, they may be whipped or starved. So, zoos teach children to value animals as property and toys, rather than individuals that deserve compassion and fundamental rights, such as the right to bodily integrity and dignity. Whatmore, it seems that guided visits to the zoo usually only improve biodiversity knowledge in a third of visitors, and professional zoo educators likely to have better results. So, increasing biodiversity knowledge while learning at schools is much better than in zoos, and improving biodiversity knowledge from visiting zoos is only a very small link to increased knowledge about conservation behavior. Moreover, we absolutely can get a lot of great information about wildlife material such as the work of David Attenborough. Attenborough's programs are much more educational than a day trip to the zoos, and perhaps also provide more information for animal research than the activities currently carried out in the zoo without harming the wild animals.

On the other hand, in urban, keeping animals in zoos has to base on the principle impedes their wild characteristics and drives them to death. According to animal behaviorists, zoo animals suffer from problems not seen in the wild, such as clinical depression in clouded leopards and gibbons, an obsessive-compulsive disorder in brown bears, and anxiety in giraffes. The animals experience these issues due to smaller enclosures, changes in diet and activities, and the introduction of things that are not seen in the wild, such as medical exams and people with cameras. A PETA investigation of numerous zoos across the country found several bear species exhibiting neurotic, stereotypic behaviors. These frustrated animals spend much of their time pacing, walking in tight circles, swaying or rolling their heads, and showing other signs of psychological distress. In some bear enclosures, paths worn by the bears' constant pacing could be seen; in others, there were actual paw impressions in the soil where bears had repeatedly stepped in the exact same spot. This behavior is symptomatic of not just boredom but also profound despondency. Besides, there are many zoos with low investment in wild animal's natural needs so that animals' normal behavior is seldom discussed and much less observed. Their natural hunting and mating behaviors are virtually eliminated by Companies Registry feeding and breeding regimens. As a result, animals are closely confined, lack privacy, and have little opportunity for mental stimulation or physical exercise often results in abnormal, self-destructive behavior, and died earlier. For example, an Oxford University study based on four decades of observing animals in captivity and the wild found that animals such as polar bears, lions, tigers, and cheetahs “show the most evidence of stress and psychological dysfunction in captivity” and that “the keeping of naturally wide-ranging carnivores should be either fundamentally improved or phased out.”. A survey of the records of 4,500 elephants both in the wild and in captivity found that the median life span for an African elephant in a zoo was 16.9 years, African elephants on a nature preserve died of natural causes at a median age of 56 years. Researchers said that “bringing elephants into zoos profoundly impairs their viability”.

Last but not least, zoos in the urban claim to want to protect species from extinction but zoo officials usually favor exotic or popular animals that draw crowds and publicity rather than threatened or endangered local wildlife. The Chinese government, for example, rents pandas to zoos worldwide for fees of more than $ 1 million per year, but some question whether the profits are being directed toward panda-conservation efforts at all. Most animals housed in zoos are not endangered, and those who are will likely never be released into natural habitats. Moreover, zoos continue to find ways to breed and maintain more animals in captivity even though they have no protective value to make profits. But when the number of animals in the zoo is too large, zoos usually carry out to kill them. A “surplus animal” is one that has “made its genetic contribution to a managed population and is not essential for future scientific studies or to maintain social-group stability or Traditions.” In other words, if a zoo already has more than enough male chimpanzees or female giraffes, it’ll make the decision to either sell or euthanize an animal. These animals have already bred with several partners and, in a way, producing their own replacements. Lifetime care is not something that's in the zoo's business model. For example, a country that has taken euthanizing zoo animals to an extreme level of callousness is Denmark. In 2014, zoo patrons witnessed a healthy giraffe shot by "conservationists" and then dissected in front of the public. The poor giraffe was eventually fed to the zoo's lions.