The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025.
Given is the graph providing a comparison of production and consumption of energy for the period of 1950- 2000 and the predicted figures for 2025 in the US.
A glance at the chart reveals that the amount of consumption surged from around 30 to 65 units during 1950-1970. Similarly, the energy production also rose from 30 and reached approximately 60 units. Referring to the information bar it is observed that in comparison with consumption, energy production was more stable, and indicated 90 and 60 units respectively so the result of the difference between them made the proportion of energy imports continue to increase from 5 to 30 units till 2005.
It is also predicted that the quantity of energy consumption will noticeably rocket and reach 140 units whereas the production will be only 80 units so about 60 units of energy will be consumed by 2025.
In conclusion, it can be noted that a great increase in energy projections is anticipated in the US.
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 75
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in in 1999. 70
- The table below shows energy used in 3 countries from 2000 2001 and the increase in usage since 1990 in percent 80
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma 90
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of Japanese tourist market. 63
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 164 200
No. of Characters: 783 1000
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.579 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.774 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.904 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 54 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 38 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.188 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.514 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.827 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.235 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4