The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004
The graph indicates the consumption of some different kinds of meat and fish in European country in 1979 and 2004.
According to the graph, consumption of fish declined in 1979 to 2004, and it decreased about 10 grams per person per week. In the same year, lamb consumption also was decreased, and it decreased from 150 grams per person per week to 70 grams per person per week. Since 1979 to 2004, beef consumption have been unstable because it had dropped from 220 grams per person per week to 180 grams per person per week by 1979 to 1980, and it raised about 40 grams per person per week in 1981 to 1984. Then, it declined regularly in 1984 to 2004. However, chicken consumption increased in 1979 to 2004, and it had declined about 150 grams per person per week.
In short, fish and meat consumption was unstable in 1979 to 2004, but overall chicken consumption was better rising than beef consumption, lamb consumption, and fish consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-11-22 | fitriarkham | 75 | view |
| 2013-05-23 | Lienk | 65 | view |
- Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest times of most people s live Others think that adults life brings more happiness in spite of greater responsibilities 76
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. discuss both these reviews, and give your opinion. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004 65
- The chart below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 60
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 167 200
No. of Characters: 758 1000
No. of Different Words: 64 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.595 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.539 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.471 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 41 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 31 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.384 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.604 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.787 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.335 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4