The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in the European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in the European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.

The given graph reveals information about four mean of transportation (train, car, tube and bus)were used by the commuters in European city given the period of 40 years.

It can be clearly seen that, overall, in 1960, bus was greatest mode of transportation where as car was highest in 2000. In 1960, bus was top of the table with highest 38 percent of commuters and that was two time more than train used. Adding to it,Tube and car were accounted for about 28 and 23 percent respectively. In 1980, both train and bus was equal traveled by the commuters at around 28 percent and 23 percent of traveler equal used car and tube modes.

The vertical graph depicts in 2000, car was used by maximum about 37 percent commuters where as tube and train were occupied second and third position with 25 and around 21 percent respectively.

It is, therefor, in 1960, the trend bus transportation was maximum and people were commute highest with private vehicle in 2000. Thus, the lifestyle of European's people was changed over the given period.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2013-07-23 Raman Toor 65 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Raman Toor :

Comments

Sentence: In 1980, both train and bus was equal traveled by the commuters at around 28 percent and 23 percent of traveler equal used car and tube modes.
Description: A noun, singular, common is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to traveler and equal

Sentence: It is, therefor, in 1960, the trend bus transportation was maximum and people were commute highest with private vehicle in 2000.
Error: therefor Suggestion: therefore

flaws:
Still have grammatical issues. Read a good grammar book.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 181 200
No. of Characters: 829 1000
No. of Different Words: 91 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.668 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.58 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.519 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 49 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 21 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.421 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.473 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.725 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.14 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4