increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
These days, number of cars is increasing on the roads due to growing population in our planet. Some people believe that increasing the gas price can mitigate this potential problem. Others people think that there are other measures we could apply to reduce the traffic and pollution. This essay will discuss both aspects before making definitive conclusion.
To begin, although increasing price of the gas can limit the cars on the roads, but it is not very good solution. Because it is impossible for people to detach from driving for longer time, they will use the cars eventually. Furthermore, this policy also affects the cost of the public transports. It would be unpopular with everyone.
With the regards to other measures, I believe that tackle to this problem, cleaner fuel need to develop. With advent of advanced technology, electric cars are available in the market. Those cars are fuel-efficient and produce less smoke in environment. In addition, persuading manufactures and traveler to adopt the new technology for air quality especially in the larger cities.
However, traffic problem will not merely solve by change a car. Government need to take various steps to minimize these problems. Firstly, they need to improve the public transports. For example, underground trains and sky trains built and effectively maintain in our major cities. The traffic will be reducing dramatically on the roads. Secondly, long distance coaches and train service should be made effectively and affordable alternative to driving your own car to long journey.
In conclusion, I believe that long-term traffic and pollution reduce by education people to use public transport more and government should use tax money to improving public transport and their maintenance.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-05-15 | drsaminayasmin | 67 | view |
2013-05-15 | Sabee | 70 | view |
2012-08-30 | maryam2900 | 73 | view |
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas 77
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- Family who do not send their children to get financed schools should not be required to pay taxes that support universal education. Do you agree or disagree. 75
- The advantages and disadvantages of computers and TV for the mental development of children 74
Sentence: Others people think that there are other measures we could apply to reduce the traffic and pollution.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to Others and people
Sentence: In conclusion, I believe that long-term traffic and pollution reduce by education people to use public transport more and government should use tax money to improving public transport and their maintenance.
Description: The fragment pollution reduce by is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace reduce with verb, past participle
flaws:
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.271 0.35
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 280 350
No. of Characters: 1450 1500
No. of Different Words: 168 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.091 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.179 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.671 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.737 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.016 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.421 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.271 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.509 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5