increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
These days, number of cars is increasing on the roads due to growing population in our planet. Some people believe that increasing the gas price can mitigate this potential problem. Others people think that there are other measures we could apply to reduce the traffic and pollution. This essay will discuss both aspects before making definitive conclusion.
To begin, although increasing price of the gas can limit the cars on the roads, but it is not very good solution. Because it is impossible for people to detach from driving for longer time, they will use the cars eventually. Furthermore, this policy also affects the cost of the public transports. It would be unpopular with everyone.
With the regards to other measures, I believe that tackle to this problem, cleaner fuel need to develop. With advent of advanced technology, electric cars are available in the market. Those cars are fuel-efficient and produce less smoke in environment. In addition, persuading manufactures and traveler to adopt the new technology for air quality especially in the larger cities.
However, traffic problem will not merely solve by change a car. Government need to take various steps to minimize these problems. Firstly, they need to improve the public transports. For example, underground trains and sky trains built and effectively maintain in our major cities. The traffic will be reducing dramatically on the roads. Secondly, long distance coaches and train service should be made effectively and affordable alternative to driving your own car to long journey.
In conclusion, I believe that long-term traffic and pollution reduce by education people to use public transport more and government should use tax money to improving public transport and their maintenance.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-05-15 | drsaminayasmin | 67 | view |
2013-05-15 | Sabee | 70 | view |
2012-08-30 | maryam2900 | 73 | view |
- The advantages and disadvantages of computers and TV for the mental development of children 74
- Writing Task 2 60
- Some people are becoming more interested in family history research Others argue we should focus on present and future generation Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030 summarise the information by selection and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant At least 150 words 80
- Writing task 1 70
Sentence: Others people think that there are other measures we could apply to reduce the traffic and pollution.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to Others and people
Sentence: In conclusion, I believe that long-term traffic and pollution reduce by education people to use public transport more and government should use tax money to improving public transport and their maintenance.
Description: The fragment pollution reduce by is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace reduce with verb, past participle
flaws:
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.271 0.35
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 280 350
No. of Characters: 1450 1500
No. of Different Words: 168 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.091 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.179 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.671 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.737 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.016 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.421 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.271 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.509 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5