Nowadays, space tourism has become a reality for some wealthy people. Some people think that this type of holiday will become more popular and less expensive in the future. Do you think a trend to such a holiday would be more of an advantage or disadvantage for society in the future? Give your opinion and some relevant examples to support your ideas.
The past 50 years have witnessed an increase in transnational travel across the world. Many holiday-makers believe that space travel will be made possible in the future thanks to remarkable developments in technology and other fields and will be beneficial to the society as a whole. However, in my opinion, despite its generally acknowledged benefits, space tourism can be disadvantageous due to several reasons.
To begin with, a plausible reason for opposing the popularity of this trend could be its cost. Unlike other types of tourism such as domestic and international ones, space travel is definitely more expensive as it requires enormous financial investment, ranging from health training sessions for customers to adequate surveillance systems. Although there has been technological advancements in recent years, it is indisputable that this new type of holiday is still a prerogative of the wealth because of the significantly high price. Therefore, I am of the opinion that space travel cannot thrive in the near future.
Additionally, another justification is that mankind is facing numerous problems that need huge budget to be solved. If the governments pour too much money into space tourism, other alarming tasks will be delayed, affecting social stability in the long term. Vietnam, where poor segment of population still accounts for a large proportion and children in remote and mountainous areas cannot access sufficient education, could be taken as a particularly salient example of this. In other words, these issues, if can be alleviated or solved completely, will be of benefit to more people than such holiday which serves only the privileged. Furthermore, it probably widens the gap between the rich and the poor, causing more headache and confusion for the authorities.
In conclusion, from my own point of view, space travel will not become popular, at least in the foreseeable future. It thus should take the backseat in the priority list for the sake of the society.
- Fast food is becoming a part of our daily life Some people argue that fast food has negative effects on our lifestyle and diet Do you agree or disagree 92
- The figures below compare the number of Internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 90
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world.Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 97
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good things. What is your opinion on this? 85
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 93
Sentence: If the goverments pour too much money into space tourism, other alarming tasks will be delayed, affecting social stability in the long term.
Error: goverments Suggestion: governments
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.041 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 317 350
No. of Characters: 1642 1500
No. of Different Words: 200 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.22 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.18 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.936 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 124 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.643 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.016 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.786 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.315 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.535 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.041 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5