Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others. However, argue that circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account. Discuss both side and give your opinion
Nowadays, the rate of crime is progressively increasing throughout the world. However, authorities are looking for solutions to dwindle crime’s rate, replacing it with the rise of security in the society. Some people claim that there should be a determined punishment for each crime. While others believe that punishment rules should be flexible and adjustable depending on the situation that the subject was in and the purpose behind the event.
On one hand, laws are established to define the framework in which people can freely act without breaking them. Since law is one of fundamental bases of a country that introduces discipline and stability to that country, it should be fixed in order to be taken serious. In particular, murder is murder, no matter who has committed the crime or why, he should be punished according to the law. Moreover, if someone thinks of the law as an adjustable element, the possibility that he commits crime will raise.
On the other hand, sometimes a crime may be committed by a person inadvertently. Furthermore, we are not born as a criminal but, if every one of us encounters a critical situation that ceases our ability of thinking, he/she may do something out of rules. Imagine a situation where someone has attacked you in the middle of the night in a dark and empty alley. You are frightened and all you want to do is to try to defend yourself and get rid of the situation. Meanwhile, there is no guarantee that you don’t hurt the attacker seriously in any way, even if you are not intending to. Therefore, in such cases authorities should consider the motivation and the circumstance of the crime to mediate the intensity of punishment.
Taking all above in to the account, in my opinion, rules are laid down equally for everyone. However, if individuals be ware of consequences of breaking rules, they will less likely to commit crimes. If this trend continues, there is a chance that number of crimes which are committing, decline considerably in the future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-07-05 | dido272000 | 63 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK scholl in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise he information and make comparison 90
- Examine the arguments in favor and against animal experiments and come to a conclusion in this issue. 90
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these view 83
- In some families there is more than one television in the home with each family member even having their own TV Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having more than one set per home 60
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree what other measures do you think might be effective 80
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 5.113 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 343 350
No. of Characters: 1619 1500
No. of Different Words: 190 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.304 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.72 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.782 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.176 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.113 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.291 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.513 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.154 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5