The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
A glance at provided table illustrates a various range of distance in miles refer to changes in modes of travel in England in the period of 1985 and 2000.
In fact, the different modes of travel per person per year are clearly defined in both 1985 and 2000 years. And it is interesting to note that some kinds of modes such as bicycle, long distance bus and taxi to trip have a low performance which are 51, 54 and 13 miles respectively while modes of travel like walking, local bus and train are taking a long that are 255, 429 and 289 miles respectively.
To compare with is that travelling by car is considered the best vehicle of transportation among all modes of travel, from 3199 to 4806 miles between 1985 and 2000. However, several modes of travel change in miles except walking, bicycle and local bus in higher degrees in the whole 15 years.
All in all, while there are some declining in miles by some types of vehicle to travel such as local bus, from 429 to 274, all modes including the main modes like a car altered from 4740 to 6475 in miles.
Sentence: To compare with is that travelling by car is considered the best vehicle of transportation among all modes of travel, from 3199 to 4806 miles between 1985 and 2000.
Description: The tag a preposition is not usually followed by is
Suggestion: Refer to with and is
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.667 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 196 200
No. of Characters: 841 1000
No. of Different Words: 101 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.742 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.291 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.308 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 44 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 31 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 14 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.037 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.56 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.826 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.169 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4