There are no longer enough natural resources to sustain current levels of
economic growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is well known fact that our world's natural resources are fundamental to our economic growth. The way our global population is consuming organic resources in the form of oil, forests and farmlands, is certainly a grave matter as it can halt the economic activity of the world as a whole.
At the outset, we have been known for sometimes that unmitigated penchant for oil and petrol is reaching high at alarming rate. The uses of motor vehicles is entirely dependent upon petrol and gasoline. For instance, oil wells of the Arabian countries fulfilling the need of the whole world by supplying over three quarter percentage of the petrol. The drop in oil resurces can potentially impact on world's economy in the long run.
Addition to that, massive clearance of farmlands that turning into urban areas are leading to the decline in economic growth.It is evident that farmlands are renewable resources of income and its optimal use in the form of agriculture practice can lead to long term sustenance of our economy. Whereas overgrowing urbanisation can restrict the economic avenues for the world.
Also, the practice of deforestration in the modern age is quite prevalent. In order to meet our ulterior motives, we are clearing off the forests without acknowledging their side effects. As a result, massive forest areas are becoming barren and results into monetary falls. From this it is clear that deforestration might seems to be yielding temporary monetary gains but lacking long standing sustenance.
To summarize, after meticulously analyzing the given statement, it can be predicted that if we keep on exploiting our natural resources and not mindful of their repurcussions, then in the near future, there will be an acute scarcity of organic products. Therefore, It is certain that we will lose our fundamental natural asset and our economy will suffer in the long run.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-07-21 | AMIT KUMAR | 70 | view |
- There are no longer enough natural resources to sustain current levels ofeconomic growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 70
- Emigration is a natural consequence of an individual s desire to improve their lives Therefore there should be no restrictions on international migration To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Provide examples and supporting evidence 70
- Mass Tourism has a negative effect on a country and should be discouraged. To what extent do you agree and disagree with this statement? 63
Sentence: It is well known fact that
Suggestion: It is a well known fact that
Sentence: At the outset, we have been known for sometimes that unmitigated penchant for oil and petrol is reaching high at alarming rate.
Description: The fragment reaching high at is rare
Suggestion: is reaching at an alarming rate.
Sentence: From this it is clear that deforestration might seems to be yielding temporary monetary gains but lacking long standing sustenance.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Suggestion: Refer to might and seems
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1541 1500
No. of Different Words: 174 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.971 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.765 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 112 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 96 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.192 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.332 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.605 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.117 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5