Different modes of European transportation from 1950, 1970 and 1990.
The bar chart reveals the outcome of the study about different modes of European transportation from 1950, 1970 and 1990.
One can see, in 1950, walking was the most popular way of transportation amongst European with 40% but that percentage declined steadily over the latter years which made walking the least favorite. A similar situation exists with the bicycle where the percentage leveled off over one half of 30% in 1950 to 1990 respectively.
On the other hand, the car had the lowest amount of users with only 10% as did the public utility bus which had around 20%. From 1970the amount of people using the bus rose consistently,Whilst in 1990, the European commuters fell gradually by 15%. Conversely, car users increased rapidly from 10% in 1950 to 25% in 1970 and 40% in 1990.
The major conclusion I can draw from the graph is that the car was the most popular way of transportation for European in the most recent years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2025-01-28 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
2025-01-28 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
2025-01-22 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
2025-01-11 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
2025-01-01 | Tabassum Zaman | 67 | view |
- The graph shows the world population by region from year 1900 to 2000. 70
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion will be to have a several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that is continuous throughout life. 90
- Eventhough globalization affects the world's economic in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. 80
- The flowchart below explain how laundry is handled Using the information from the flow chart describe the laundry process 51
- The table below describes the number of students studying foreign languages in some country in 2000 2005 87
the car had the lowest amount of users with only 10% as did the public utility bus which had around 20%.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 163 200
No. of Characters: 746 1000
No. of Different Words: 96 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.573 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.577 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.598 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 44 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 34 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 21 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.712 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.47 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.774 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4