The graph below presents the information about Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest in Brooklyn’s Coney Island, USA.

Essay topics:

The graph below presents the information about Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest in Brooklyn’s Coney Island, USA.

Given is the bar chart showing Nathan’s hot dog eating contest which is held in Brooklyn’s Coney Island, USA during 30 years, between 1980 and 2010.

Overall, there are four countries: US, Japan, Mexico and Germany scoring for winners. In this case, American males have won 20 times for this eating contest, while Japanese males only record nine-time win.

To begin with, from 1980 to 1982 we can see that American males had won the contest, with approximately 9 to 10 hot dogs and buns eaten. After no breaking records since 2 years, the figures of American contestants showing the overall growth in numbers of hot dogs and burns eaten had rebounded on the podium for 10 years, between 1985 and 1995. By comparison with the previous figures in 1999, American males had almost fourfold proportion of eating this meal.

A Japanese, Takeru Kobayashi who reigned Nathan’s championship for six years running, was defeated by Joey Chesnut, an American, who was highly likely to eat 68 hot dogs and buns in 15 minutes in 2009. This was the top notch ever during the eating contest. However, between 1983 and 1984 Birgit Felden, a German female, only consuming almost 9 hot dogs and a Mexican, who ate 19.5 hot dogs had showed that this competition was open to all contestants from different countries.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2014-02-01 eddysuaib 90 view

Comments

Given is the bar chart showing Nathan’s hot dog eating contest which is held
Given is the bar chart showing Nathan’s hot dog eating contests which were held

However, between 1983 and 1984 Birgit Felden, a German female, only consuming almost 9 hot dogs and a Mexican, who ate 19.5 hot dogs...
Description: It is not clear

flaws:
No. of Words: 222 200

Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 222 200
No. of Characters: 1041 1000
No. of Different Words: 137 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.86 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.689 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.346 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 52 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.499 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.413 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.672 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.109 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4