Analysing the graph it is possible to notice that the four countries of overseas students in Australia have in common periods of dramatic increase for what concerns Indonesia and Singapore and periods of fluctuation for what concerns instead Hong Kong and Malaysia.
Indonesia in fact, after having constantly raised until 1994, had a significant increase to almost 30 thousand students, with a small fall and an immediate final upward between 1998 and 2000.
Singapore instead, was static from 1982 to 1986 with a raise from the following years reaching 20 thousands of students.
About the other 2 countries analysed, they present these similarities: Hong Kong in the period 1982-1986 had a fixed situation until 1998 when the number of students started to fluctuate for the next 10 years and instead Malaysia that initially increased, remained constant from 1984 to 1994 and then started its period of fluctuation until 2000 with approximately 20 thousand students.
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 57
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 63
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 70
flaws:
No. of Words: 154 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 154 200
No. of Characters: 801 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.523 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.201 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.69 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 51 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 38.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.141 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.569 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.097 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4