The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the percentage of tourists to England who visited certain Brighton attractions from the period of 1980 to 2010. According to the graph, the most attractive places were the pavilion and the festival in 2010. In 1980, the least popular attraction was the pier but in 2010 this changed and the art gallery was the least popular.
Beginning of 80s, the incremental number of tourists was the Art Gallery and the Pier. The most increase was the Art Gallery to reach at about 38% in 1985. This figure had fallen to the lowest figure of less than 10% in 2010. In comparison, there were steadily incremental tourists for the Pier, which started from 10% in 80s and sudden pick in 2000 to reach at just over 22% in 2010.
The visitors in the Pavilion showed a sharp increase during 1980s to 1990s from well over 20% to almost 50% respectively. Almost half of visitors had visited the Pavilion in 1995. This figure had fallen slightly after that period to reach at slightly over 30% in 2010.
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia. 70
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 70
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000 68
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 64
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country over a two-year period. 70
and the art gallery was the least popular.
and the art gallery was the least popular one.
and the art gallery was least popular.
flaws:
You lost Festival in the graph.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 179 200
No. of Characters: 807 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.658 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.508 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.402 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 52 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.243 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.2 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.417 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.6 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.133 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4