The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The table gives information about financial status of the Australian households in 1999, with a further classification by established family type.
According to the data given by the table, it can be clearly seen that the majority of the population are not threatened by poverty. In addition, the order of the family types after proportion is different from the ones after numbers.
Having an analysis by the level of percentage and figures, 11% of Australian families (about 1837000) live in poverty. The highest low-income proportion (21%) is recorded by sole parents, whereas, they do not represent the highest number of household, reached by couples with children (99300). The single, no children family has remained on the second highest place, only 19% and 359000 individuals. Evidently, the aged and without children couple and single people are not seriously affected by poverty. The aged couple recorded the lowest proportion (4%) and number (4800). The figure of sole parents is similar to the couples without children about 250000 households.
In conclusion, aged families are not likely to have a critical financial status, more than other categories.
- The bar charts and line graph show the results of a survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city 84
- With an increasing population communicating via Internet and text message face to face communication will became a thing in the past To what extent do you agree 90
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 60
- "Prevention is better than cure."Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 60
- With the rise in popularity of the Internet newspapers will soon become a thing of the past To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 80
with a further classification by established family type.
with a further classification by the established family type.
the order of the family types after proportion is different from the ones after numbers.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
Sentence: The single, no children family has remained on the second highest place, only 19 and 359000 individuals.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to children and family
Sentence: Evidently, the aged and without children couple and single people are not seriously affected by poverty.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to children and couple
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
what do you mean 'aged families' ?
-------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 183 200
No. of Characters: 942 1000
No. of Different Words: 107 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.678 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.148 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.727 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 78 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 59 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.3 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.173 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.37 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.616 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.059 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4