The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by ludovicag on Wed, 07/31/2019 - 07:00

The table gives information about the percentage of Australian people living in poverty in 1999. The data are organized in different family types.
Overall, all households considered accounted for 11% of the Australian population. It is noticeable that levels of poverty were higher for single people than for couples, and people with children were more likely to be poor than those without. poverty rates were considerably lower among elderly people.
Aged people were the least likely to be poor, representing the 6% for singles 4% for couples of the total. Closely enough, couples without children were living in poverty at that time with a rate of 7%, a proportion that rises to 12% when considering couples with children.
The highest share of people living in poverty was represented by single parents, one-fifth of the total, with a percentage of 21% in 1999, almost 232000 people. Just 2 percentage points less, single people without children living in poverty were 19% of all the Australian population.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-31 ludovicag 73 view
2019-07-17 Reet kaur sandhu 2 56 view
2017-12-14 sherin rijo 73 view
2017-12-11 milanree1527@yahoo.com 70 view
2016-09-12 tvaishnavi 81 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user ludovicag :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Poverty
...e likely to be poor than those without. poverty rates were considerably lower among eld...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e 19% of all the Australian population.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18902439024 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69732141793 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567073170732 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6158208283 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120963986625 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066738973585 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631549315835 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10530086201 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858168230065 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.