The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The table provides information about poverty levels in Australia in 1999. It is noticeable that single people had higher level of poverty in comparison to the other categories.
First of all, aged people had the lowest rate among poor peoples, 6% for single aged couple and 4% for aged couple. Whereas on the other hand, sole parent were more probable to be poor, so that they had 21% of total people living at poverty line.
The second highest rate in poverty belonged to single no children (19%), while in contrast, couple no children with 7% of proportion of poverty were the third lowest rate. In addition, the percentage of poverty in couple with children (21%) was greater compared to couple with no children.
Taking into account all the provided information, 11% of Australians were living in poverty line. Besides, the highest and the lowest poverty rates appertained to sole parent and aged couple respectively.
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior Others disagree and think that host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 57
- The chart below shows information about average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 60
- Some People Think That Universities Should Provide Graduates with the Knowledge and Skills Needed in the Workplace. Others Think That the True Function of a University Should Be to Give Access to Knowledge for Its Own 65
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 74
flaws:
No. of Words: 154 200
Sentence Length SD: 5.449 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 154 200
No. of Characters: 737 1000
No. of Different Words: 82 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.523 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.786 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.502 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.449 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.461 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.743 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.103 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4