The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

The table provides information about poverty levels in Australia in 1999. It is noticeable that single people had higher level of poverty in comparison to the other categories.

First of all, aged people had the lowest rate among poor peoples, 6% for single aged couple and 4% for aged couple. Whereas on the other hand, sole parent were more probable to be poor, so that they had 21% of total people living at poverty line.

The second highest rate in poverty belonged to single no children (19%), while in contrast, couple no children with 7% of proportion of poverty were the third lowest rate. In addition, the percentage of poverty in couple with children (21%) was greater compared to couple with no children.

Taking into account all the provided information, 11% of Australians were living in poverty line. Besides, the highest and the lowest poverty rates appertained to sole parent and aged couple respectively.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-05 tahmeed20192020 22 view
2019-09-10 berua 73 view
2019-08-13 Bholo 56 view
2019-08-03 an111 73 view
2019-07-31 ludovicag 73 view
Essays by user kaj :

Comments

flaws:
No. of Words: 154 200
Sentence Length SD: 5.449 7.5

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 154 200
No. of Characters: 737 1000
No. of Different Words: 82 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.523 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.786 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.502 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.449 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.461 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.743 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.103 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4