The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The table provides information about poverty levels in Australia in 1999. It is noticeable that single people had higher level of poverty in comparison to the other categories.
First of all, aged people had the lowest rate among poor peoples, 6% for single aged couple and 4% for aged couple. Whereas on the other hand, sole parent were more probable to be poor, so that they had 21% of total people living at poverty line.
The second highest rate in poverty belonged to single no children (19%), while in contrast, couple no children with 7% of proportion of poverty were the third lowest rate. In addition, the percentage of poverty in couple with children (21%) was greater compared to couple with no children.
Taking into account all the provided information, 11% of Australians were living in poverty line. Besides, the highest and the lowest poverty rates appertained to sole parent and aged couple respectively.
- The chart below shows information about average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 60
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior Others disagree and think that host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 95
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where re 80
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
flaws:
No. of Words: 154 200
Sentence Length SD: 5.449 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 154 200
No. of Characters: 737 1000
No. of Different Words: 82 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.523 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.786 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.502 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.449 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.461 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.743 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.103 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4