The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table compares the proportion of variety categories of families living poverty that were divided in seven groups in Australia in 1999.

In each of these types, age couple was fewer amount of people lived in proverty than single aged person., single without children, couple with no children, sole parent, couple with children and all households. It is also noticeable that allhouseholds class had over 18.370 people living in privation.

For aged couple class and single aged person class had at four per cent and six per cent which stayed in the line of privation with number population less than 55.000 individuals. Then at 12 per cent in couple with family class with at 933.000 population and finding around more than 110.000 pairs poor economy that was equal population between single parent without children and having children when were combined.

The higest of population was all households at 1.837.000 population with at 11 per cent included poor people.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-07-07 Tran Thu 61 view
2016-12-04 Thien 61 view
2016-07-27 FlorinHF 84 view
2016-07-25 FlorinHF 84 view
2015-03-31 nundc 80 view
Essays by user v.oktaria :

Comments

living poverty that
living in poverty that

Sentence: In each of these types, age couple was fewer amount of people lived in proverty than single aged person., single without children, couple with no children, sole parent, couple with children and all households.
Error: proverty Suggestion: property

Sentence: The higest of population was all households at 1.837.000 population with at 11 per cent included poor people.
Error: higest Suggestion: highest

flaws:
Some sentences are not clear enough to depict the table.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 158 200
No. of Characters: 796 1000
No. of Different Words: 88 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.545 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.038 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.405 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 64 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 36 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.825 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.493 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.822 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.13 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4