The 3 pie charts show the total school spending in all three years (1981, 1991 and 2001) in the UK. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate how much a UK school spent on 5 different categories in 3 years: 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, teachers' salaries made up the highest proportion, while the least percentage of annual spending belonged to insurance in given years.
As can be seen from the charts, the greatest expenditure was on salaries. However, whereas other workers' salaries witnessed a quick fall from 28% in 1981 to 15% in 2001, teachers' salaries remained the highest percentage over the period, rising to half of the total expense in 1991 before dropping back by 5% in 2001.
The budget spent on furniture and equipment saw a wild fluctuation throughout the years. There was a fall to only 5% of total spending in 1991, which was followed by an increase to nearly 25% in 2001. In contrast, the share of resouces like books saw an opposite trend. The cost increased moderately to 20% in 1991, but 10 years later declined sharply to only 9%. only a small proportion of money spent on insurance with 2%, 3% and 8% in 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively.
- People are living longer. Some people think that it causes big problems. Others, however, think the aging population has many advantages for business, government and society in general. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The diagram below shows how a hot air balloon ascends and descends 86
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainmeSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.W 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 365, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
...ears later declined sharply to only 9%. only a small proportion of money spent on in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77049180328 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66331644787 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5983870705 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19295477053 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741961074844 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762039321825 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120664656181 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803685505395 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.