7. The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption.
The line graph gives information about the amount of meat and poultry in four instinct groups consumed in America for per capita over the year from 1955 to 2012.
It is noticeable that beef was the most popular product in 1955 while broilers owned the highest products by 2012. Except for the consumption for broilers which increased dramatically, those for the other three categories remained relatively stable over the period shown.
In 1955, people in the US bought 60 pounds of beef and 50 pounds of pork on average. Then, the demands for beef was generally increasing till 1976 and kept dropping after that, with the average consumption of 50 pounds in 2012. Pork consummation, experiencing the lowest point in 1975 (50 pounds), decreased slightly in 2012 with a fall of 8 pounds for per person.
We can see that there was no information recorded before 1961 for broilers and turkey. From 1961, broilers started becoming accepted by people, consumed from only 15 pounds to 55 pounds for per person, with a peak in 2008 (60 pounds per capita). Over the 51-year period, single American’s needs for turkey in the US stayed the same with a little rise from 5 to 11 pounds.
- The Increased availability of consumer credit in some countries has contributed to the problem of consumer debt Some people say that the financial institutions that lend money are responsible for high levels of Indebtedness Others say it is the individual 92
- TPO 44 70
- 7 The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 90
- The most important thing the government should do to improve health care is to clean the environment. 76
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving collage in 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8275862069 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54145183072 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610837438424 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4446693648 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0770358244144 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345922848105 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411997458825 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570576162565 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456132169342 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.