The average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010
The pice carts given below illustrate the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. The data present in percentage. overall it can be seen that the biggest percentage was housing while the most negative trend was health care.
In the one hand, in 1950 housing experience decrease which significantly the biggest 50% followed by education the biggest 0.3% and which experience significantly the biggest 22.8% and then which the second higher by other was 14.8% followed by transportation was 10.7% and which the smallest was 2.1%.
On the other hand, in 2010 housing experience decrease which significantly namely the biggest 50% followed by education which the biggest 0.3%. For increase which higher and significantly was by food the biggest 22.8% and the second higher by other was 14.8% followed by transportation was 10.7% and then which smallest was 2.1%.
From two the pie charts can br accepted, in 1950 housing have the biggest percentage was 72.20% but in 2010 housing experience decrease the biggest 50.1% and which experience significantly increase by food which the biggest percentage was 22.8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 67
- The average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...d 2010. The data present in percentage. overall it can be seen that the biggest percent...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2817679558 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82705622139 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403314917127 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.1833556608 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.571428571 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12384222156 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108439253454 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.208160749741 0.0843802449381 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11207906551 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126407329306 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.