The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of france in two years
The pie charts below describe the percentages of the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France between 1995 and 2005. In general, this represents a huge increase in the number of energy production in France that is coal to be the trend energy production.
In the one hand, in 1995, coal got 29.80% which the higher category than the other energy, followed by gas was 29.63% as the second higher, then petro was 29.27% was the third category, furthermore nuclear was 6.40% and the other energy just got 4.90%.
Moreover, in 2005, the energy production of the experiences of different so significant from the last data, which coal increase to 1.13% that is 30.93%, then gas was 30.31%, but petro decrease to 9.82% that is 19.55%, after that nuclear got 10.10% and the other energy was 9.10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | CHÚC | view | |
| 2023-07-02 | Risti | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view |
- The pie charts below sahow the comparison of differnet kinds of energy production of france in two years 73
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh than the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, then, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 676.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86330935252 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46377407705 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568345323741 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 184.5 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4498854086 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.0 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.75 22.9334400587 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.75 5.23603664747 320% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239012688691 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205329515631 0.103423049105 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198601159761 0.0843802449381 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192016131265 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194548860489 0.0819641961636 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.