The pie charts illustrate the distribution of various energy sources in a given nation in the years 1995 and 2005
Overall, it is readily inevitable that the generation of two main energies (coal and gas) rose marginally, while petro declined considerably. “Other” and nuclear also grew greatly, despite remaining less popular in both years
In 1995, coal, gas, and petro were roughly equal in terms of energy production with each slightly above 29%. By 2005, the figures for coal and gas had risen moderately (30.93% and 30,31%, respectively) while petro experienced a dramatic decrease, accounting for approximately 20% of the total
The data for the rest categories was relatively lower with “other” accounting for 4,9% of energy production to begin the period and nuclear stood at 6.4%. by 2005, “other” had narrowed the disparity and nearly doubled to 9.1%, and the generation of nuclear energy grew slightly to reach 10.1%
- Many young people change their jobs and careers What are the reasons for this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations 73
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie graphs below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years pie comparison
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people while others say that technology has the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 78