Some individuals believe that the governmental allocation of financial resources should be distributed to other impoverished countries while others suppose that it is important to focus on curbing their domestic issues. Personally, I totally advocate the proposal of determining national priority on internal problems.
It is understandable why some believe that it is necessary for governments to provide cross-border support. In some countries, people are facing problems that can easily be solved with the help of other countries. For instance, thanks to foreign assistance many Africans can escape from hunger and stabilize their lives. Furthermore, countries can dramatically improve international relations through international aid, leading to greater cooperation between nations. Also, spending money on such a program can help tackle urgent global issues, such as climate change and migration, since people are less likely to move abroad or destroy forests to make way for agriculture if their living standards are improved.
However, I still argue that the government should prioritize addressing domestic issues such as homelessness or unemployment. First, financial funds from the government are regarded as a crucial means to reserve and maintain welfare schemes as well as social security. The smooth flow of how society works, in fact, would create a favorable environment for job opportunities which accordingly increases the economic growth rate. Second, employment chances, as a result, generate more personal budgets which people can use to afford decent shelters, substantially decreasing the homelessness rate.
In conclusion, although transnational support should be executed due to its positive effects, I still believe that any government should put the goal of tackling internal issues in a country to be the top priority.
- The pie graphs below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years pie comparison
- People should look after their health as a duty for a society rather than for personal benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Cambridge 15 Test 1 Writing task 1 The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in give Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- In order to study at university students are required to pay expensive tuition fees Not all students can afford them so some people think that university education should be free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays some older people choose to live in retirement communities with other people rather than living with their adult children Is it a positive or negative development 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78754578755 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11444934311 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663003663004 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7670126761 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215199322464 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674649687472 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348740286116 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113814596424 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350696524512 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78754578755 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11444934311 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663003663004 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7670126761 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215199322464 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674649687472 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348740286116 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113814596424 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350696524512 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.