The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009.
The graph illustrates changes in the levels of internet users in three countries from 1999 to 2009, and is measured in percentages. Overall, it is able to be seen that, over the period the levels of internet users rose in all three countries.
Canada and USA used the most internet. They began at a similar level of between 2 and 5 per cents in 1999. These countries from year to year undergo increased sharply. However, they both then followed a similar trend, increasing steadily to 25 percent (USA) and 30 percent (Canada).
Mexico was the smaller class of percentage. Internet users stood at 1 percent per year in 1999, which was lower than USA or Canada. In the first increasing was 2 percent in 2001, it is followed by the next increasing at 8 percent in 2005, and then the last increasing in 2009 was only 10 percent.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 67
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 683.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61486486486 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53733085055 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8720174781 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8888888889 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220425090847 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101090237219 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113851388902 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16719501007 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117165198434 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.