The chart below show the percentage of male and famale teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK 2010.
The bar charts given below information the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK 2010. The data present in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the highest percentage was women meanwhile the smallest was men.
In the one hand, between women and man which got the biggest percentage was women which got around 80% which was the biggest category namely in the nursery/pre-school, followed by primary school with percentage degree between 80% which was highest second, but for secondary school, college, private institute and university percentage degree experienced decrease between 40% up to around 20%.
On the other hand, from men degree percentage from nursery/pre-school, primary school, secondary school, college, private training institute and university experience increase around 0% up to 60% which experienced increase significantly.
From the bar charts can be accepted conclusion between women and men which percentage experienced increase was men 60% and women percentage degree experienced decrease as for as around 20%
- The chart below show the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 73
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 67
- The average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 73
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...ith percentage degree between 80% which was highest second, but for secondary school, colle...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63855421687 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.151564045 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493975903614 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.03139668 43.030603864 267% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.0 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18314498823 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142031472179 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.238786828472 0.0843802449381 283% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145518773161 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171608555338 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.