The average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
The two pie charts illustrate the proportions of expenses for 5 different categories, which were spent by the Japanese and the Malaysians in 2010. Overall, it can be seen that while people in Japan spent the highest amount of money on other goods and services, the majority of Malaysian’s expenditure was housing.
To begin with, the Japanese spent most of their money, about 29%, on goods and services. However, only 6% of their income was used for health care. The other expenses were divided into three groups in the similar percentages for food, housing, and transport, about one fifth of the expenditures.
On the other hand, housing was the most expensive expense in Malaysia, at 34%. The amount of money spent on food was similar to that on other goods and services, approximately one fourth, whereas, only 10% was spent on transport. As well as in Japan, Malaysian health care received a little money in this country, at just 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-09 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
- The comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016
- The expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens 78
- The average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 11
- The chart illustrates the percentage of male and female executives in six different types of profession across the UK in 2007 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, whereas, while, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9125 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66338013622 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3299817375 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0729575922832 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333025834575 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035628916728 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542172164856 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436866086957 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.