The bar graph provides information about mean prices per kilometre of clothing, which was imported from six different countries into the European Union in 1993 and 2003.
Overall, average prices per kilometre of clothing imported from China, India and Bangladesh were considerably higher in 2003 as compared to these in 1993. However, the mean cost of textile products imported from Argentina and Japan declined slightly in 2003 in comparison to 1993.
Argentina was the most expensive supplier of textile products in both years analyzed, the average price per kilometre of clothing was about 28 ponds in 1993 and 26 pounds in 2003. In contrast, Bangladesh provided the cheapest textile, which was imported for about 3 pounds per kilometre in 1993 and for slightly more than 5 pounds in 2003.
Brazil was the only stable country, which sold clothing for equal price about 23 pounds in 1993 and 2003. On the other hand, China showed the most considerable gain in absolute value of average price, the gap between 1993 and 2003 was about 7 pounds per kilometre of clothing.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Advertising influences people's behavior in a negative way.use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 89
- Some people think that money is one of the most essential factors in promoting happiness.Do you think people can be happy without much money? what other factors contribute towards happiness? 56
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages ? 97
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 11
- As children become adults, their social behavior changes in some ways.What are the main differences between young children’s social behavior and that of adults. To what extend are the changes that took place good? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06741573034 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51735548775 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511235955056 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8760191054 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340453574478 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193072464586 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110044461268 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258681468349 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113164069891 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.