The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban, rural and town between 1995 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the proportion of people born in and outside Australia, along with the percentage of newborn babies in three different areas between 1995 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that most parents decided to give birth in urban areas with an increase in the figure for cities. However, a significant decline was recorded in the percentage of children born in the countryside. Besides, most births witnessed outside Australia's border were in cities whereas less developed regions tend to be more popular places for giving birth in Australia when compared to other countries.
In 1995, around half of Australian babies were born in urban areas. Meanwhile, only a fifth of them was born in towns, which was about 10% lower than that of rural regions. However, 15 years later, the figures for towns and rural areas experienced downfalls to become equal. Moreover, an increase of over 12% was seen in the proportion of Australians born in cities in 2010.
Similar to Australia, places outside Australia witnessed a dominace in the percentage births recorded in cities. In 1995, 60% of newborn children was seen in developed areas, which was 20% higher than that of rural ones. Finally, towns and rural areas outside Australia witnessed noticeable falls in the proportion of births to be lower than 10% in 2010 while that of cities increased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Linh12324r | view |
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 78
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 84
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today Some people think that it will improve people s lives in many ways Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- More tasks at home and work are being done by robots Do the pros outweigh the cons 89
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09417040359 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61132130816 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506726457399 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7184958009 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.272727273 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287676353059 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116736981961 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738096904311 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195467520213 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054198083689 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.