The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the overseas tourism volume in three regions, the coast, the mountains and the lakes in a Western nation from 1987 to 2007.

Overall, it is clear that the coast was the most common choice for foreign travellers while the lakes seemed to be the least attractive option. Besides, although the lake experienced a significant change in the number of foreigners, no discernible variation was recorded in the figure for mountainous areas.

In 1987, only 10 thousand overseas visitors came to the lakes, which was half and a fourth of the mountains and the coast respectively. However, due to a noticeable rise in the following years, the number of foreign tourists to the lakes surpassed the mountains in 1992 to become the second most visited destination in 1997. Meanwhile, steady growth was seen in the tourism of the coast with 50 thousand visitors in 1997.

In the remaining years of the period, the figure for the coast kept increasing gradually to reach its peak of around 75 thousand overseas tourists in 2007. Nevertheless, there was little change in the number of travellers having their vacations in mountainous regions. Finally, after skyrocketing in 2002, the number of the lakes decreased remarkably to 50 thousand foreign tourists.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-16 honguyenlily 67 view
2023-11-02 tracywu 73 view
2023-10-23 Giang Tran 61 view
2023-10-23 Giang Tran 61 view
2023-10-23 Giang Tran 67 view
Essays by user lalo :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, nevertheless, second, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13942307692 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81275475506 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0518477952 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103162251746 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478069092248 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418989265363 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759382946358 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470797067085 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.