The bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010.
The bar chart given compares the information in term of utilizing the water of different nations, namely China, USA, Russia, and Australia in 2000.
Overall, the water was used the most popular in agricultural in four countries whereas there was an opposite pattern with the purpose of water domestic.
As for the Chinese, the water used for agricultural ranked on a top, roughly 85% while this for the other countries was a half. The highest rate use water of Australian was 60% for internal's aim. Converse to China, USA and Russia have less than 20%. Meanwhile, most of the water used for industry in China more than Australia, 7% and 3% respectively.
Regarding the agricultural water, the Russian had a lower utilizing than American, 30% and 39% respectively. There was the same tendency to the purpose of domestic in these countries. 45% the number of American used for industrial water, Russian used this aim higher by 15%.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 89
- THE CHART BELOW SHOWS THE ACTUAL AND ESTIMATED NUMBER OF VISITORS TO A NEW ART GALLERY FROM ITS OPENING DATE IN 1990 UP TO AND INCLUDING 2001 iT ALSO INDICATES THREE EVENTS IN THE GALLERY S LIFE BELOW THE CHART THERE ARE TWO PIE CHARTS WHICH SHOW THE SATI 70
- Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- the percentage of visitors per month in Summer 2013 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94267515924 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71767847606 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592356687898 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.903900478 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2222222222 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296209634044 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13231177517 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108042840439 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197981266689 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118359262424 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.