The bar chart below illustrates the use of tobacco products by secondary school students in the United States

The rendered bar chart depicts information about the consumption of cigarette products by senior secondary schools students the nation under consideration in the United States. There seven products of tobacco.

At firs glance it can be clearly seen bar chart that middle school students registered the highest mark in any use that was accounted for 13 percent. It was followed by cigarrettes and cigars, having proportion of 9 percent and 4 percent smokeless and bidis recorded similar that was emerged as 3 percent each. Pipes and kreteks recorded for lowest that was recorded for 2 percent in each.

Moving towards further analysis it is crystal clear that High school students cigarrettes surpassed the percentage of cigars but it left behind any use that was emerged as 26 percent 15 percent and 35 percent. The consumption of smokeless bidis, krekets and pipes fell in decending order that was ranging between 6 percent and 1 percent.

Thus from an overall analysis it is crystal clear that any use is higher consumed by middle school and high school students as compare to other tobacco products.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cigarrettes surpassed the percentage of cigars but it left behind any use that w...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ng between 6 percent and 1 percent. Thus from an overall analysis it is crystal ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63289456687 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2727357567 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232597775931 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123791480833 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112380721213 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17892030563 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126775750431 0.0819641961636 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.