The bar chart below shiws the global sales of television by supervision incorporataion from 1999- 2012.
Tge given bar chart depicts, the social media (television) observation incorporation between 1999 -2012.
According to the graph, in 2012 was shown increased and in 1999 year was represnted decreased. On the other hand year by year was slightly gone up and down. As a general trend, between 1999- 2000 television incorparate started years were presented approximately same. Coversely, in 2004 year started and signuficantly climbed in 2008. Obviously, in 2009 year was steadily plummeted. On the on side lots of televisions were sold in 2012 and it was shown just under a half. While the few televisions were sold in 1999 it was cleared under 10. Overall, most of peoples were bought in 1999. And year by year was dramatically changed this siyuation . Between 2011 and 2012 years were shown remained stable.
- The chart below shows information about the challenges people face when they go to live in othe countries. 67
- Only people who earn a lot of money are succefulDo you agree or disagree? 61
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The graph below shows the percentage of household grouped by poverty on basis of access to refrigerator electricity and water in Ghana for the year 1991 1992 to 1998 1999 68
- The line graph below shows the case of diseases caused by x virus in Australia from 1960 to 1995. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bed in 2008. Obviously, in 2009 year was steadily plummeted. On the on side lots ...
^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...012 and it was shown just under a half. While the few televisions were sold in 1999 i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the peoples') or simply say ''most peoples''.
Suggestion: most of the peoples; most peoples
... 1999 it was cleared under 10. Overall, most of peoples were bought in 1999. And year by year w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... was dramatically changed this siyuation . Between 2011 and 2012 years were shown ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 675.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 133.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07518796992 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.39596269041 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81916751938 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616541353383 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 186.3 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4183052937 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.3636363636 112.824112599 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.0909090909 22.9334400587 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150285175084 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677122868368 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710528767007 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176368513439 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762797307641 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.