The bar chart illustrates how many hours per week young adults in Chester spent on seven activities between 2002 to 2007.
All these years, the most amount of time was spent on watching television, whereas the least favorite activity was bowling. The number of hours increased for activities like watching television, going to pubs and discos, and shopping. We could see a significant decline in the number of hours spent on activities like doing homework or playing a sport or bowling. The only task which saw fluctuation in the number of hours spent was watching DVD's.
Teenagers spent 25 hours watching television for the initial two years which rose to around 38 hours per week by 2007. The hours per week also increased for activities like going to pubs and discos and shopping (around 8 to 18 hours and 6 to 15 hours respectively) too.
Over the years lesser hours were spent on doing homework, it was reduced from around 12 hours to 6 hours per week. Similarly, sports activities also reduced from 10 hours to hardly around 3 hours. Bowling activity never gained popularity, it remained between approximately 4 hours to 1 hour. In fact, watching DVD's rose from around 10 hours to 18 hours, which again dropped to 10 hours by 2007.
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 84
- Advantages and disadvantages of mobile phones in our daily lives 73
- A gift such as a camera a soccer ball or an animal can contribute to a child s development What gift would you give to help a child develop Why Use reasons and specific examples to support your choice
- The bar chart below shoes the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 73
- Some people use the internet to search for solutions to their medical problems Is it a Positive or negative development Give your own opinion and examples from your own experience 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, whereas, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81775700935 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54569986924 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514018691589 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6686393962 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334643562396 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156712981161 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911337686246 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243403897655 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985137245839 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.