The bar chart compares the amount of money invested in each category by five organizations.
In general, it can be seen that of the five organizations, organization B spends the most money on its investment. Additionally, the amount of money spent on building is higher than other categories in five organizations.
Turning to the chart for the details, organization B spends the most on staff training, at about €1,9 billion, while the organizations D and E spend more money than other categories on building, at nearly €1 billion each. By contrast, organization B’s spending on machinery is the lowest (€0.9 billion), while organization D and E invest the least in research, only €0.6 and €0.7 billion.
In terms of the remaining organizations, organization A has the highest expenditure on building with around €1.5 billion, while the highest amount of money in organization C is allocated to machinery and research, at about €1.3 billion each. It is noticeable that organization A spends more money than organization C on staff training, at €1.2 and €0.8 billion respectively.
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 73
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nds the most on staff training, at about €1,9 billion, while the organizations D ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30857142857 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31568443391 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497142857143 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0171256612 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.714285714 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231960958425 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166894417768 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177295776266 0.0843802449381 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239596956405 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.201343999621 0.0819641961636 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.