The chart illustrates the proportion of people working in different fields in town A and town B from 1960 to2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of citizens working in services sector in both towns A and town B increased, while there was a decrease in manufacturing field in town A and B during the period shown.
Turning to the chart for the detail, in 1960, manufacturing sector accounted for 41% of working people in town A, compared to 70% of those in town B. There were about 30% of town A’s labor force working in sales and services fields, which was much higher than those in town B, at 20% and 10% respectively.
By 2010, services field peaked at 64% of the working population in town A, in comparison with a significant increase in those of town B (25%). In addition, the percentage of people working in manufacturing sector in town A and B experienced a considerable fall at 20% and 53% respectively. Notably, there was a double decline in sales sector in town A, to 16%, whereas sales field in town B grew slightly to 22%.
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 84
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54210526316 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84095980816 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478947368421 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.324364739 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528144234048 0.215688989381 245% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.286202621644 0.103423049105 277% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100146759559 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.372124026961 0.15604864568 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653867004903 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.