It is true that juveniles are more likely to engage in criminal activities. There are some reasons behind this phenomenon, including inadequate parental guidance and heavy exposure to violence on the internet. Several actions could be implemented by the government and individuals to improve the situation.
There are two primary reasons why juvenile crimes are becoming commonplace. Chief of these could be insufficient parental supervision. These days, many parents spend less time with their children due to hectic working schedules. Without direct parental care and guidance, these children are more susceptible to engaging in criminal activities such as shoplifting or drug abuse because of peer pressure. Additionally, the proliferation of the internet allows teenagers to access any websites they want, especially ones containing inappropriate and violent content at their ages. According to a survey, children exposed to violent programs are more likely to mimic and apply such acts from websites to deal with their problems in life, compared to other children of the same age.
Fortunately, several actions could be taken to mitigate these issues. Firstly, teenagers committing minor offenses, including shoplifting or pocketing, should be sent to reform schools where they are taught about ethnic lessons and the right behaviors. For serious crimes such as murder or drug abuse, heavy penalties or longer prison sentences should be introduced. Such measures would serve as a deterrent to potential offenders from committing crimes. Secondly, parents must have a good work-life balance, enabling them to spend more time with their children and encouraging them to participate in outdoor activities instead of computer-screen ones.
In conclusion, teenagers commit more crimes for various reasons, including insufficient parental monitoring and heavy exposure to violent behaviors on the internet. However, these can be tackled by teaching them about ethnicity and stricter punishments for dangerous criminals, as well as by spending more time with their children. I am also convinced that juvenile criminal activities will decrease once these methods are implemented.
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 67
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 84
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Young people are committing more crimes Discuss the causes and solutions for this problem 84
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 779, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pared to other children of the same age. Fortunately, several actions could be t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivities instead of computer-screen ones. In conclusion, teenagers commit more cr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77777777778 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95032024953 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598765432099 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.3494519547 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.8 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131130892466 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414646900494 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361516815219 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871256415203 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336050544651 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 779, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pared to other children of the same age. Fortunately, several actions could be t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivities instead of computer-screen ones. In conclusion, teenagers commit more cr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77777777778 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95032024953 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598765432099 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.3494519547 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.8 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131130892466 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414646900494 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361516815219 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871256415203 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336050544651 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.