The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent on consumer goods in 2010.
The chart illustrates the amount of money spent on five categories in two different nations, namely France and UK, in 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling.
Overall, people in both Frace and UK spent most of their money on cars whereas the kind of commodity that people expended th least expenditure was perfume in UK and cameras in France. Futhermore, there was a significant different between the spending on cameras in France and UK.
In terms of cars, British spent approximately 450,000 pounds on it, as opposed to the amout of money spent in France was 400,000. Similarly, expenditure on books in UK was higher than that in France, with over 400,000 compared to 300,000. Moreover,in UK, the spending on cameras was over double that in Frace, with about 350,000 and 150.000 respectively.
On the other hand, the remaining cosumer goods was spent money by Franch more than by British. The consumers in France spent almost 400,000 on computers, which was a sightly higher than in UK where exactly 350,000 was paid out. The amount of money that people in France spent on perfume stood at 200,000 while at sightly under 150,000 in UK.
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent on consumer goods in 2010 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries 60
- Some people believe that the best way to encourage children that have a healthy diet at school and some people believe that parents should teach them to have a healthy diet Discuss both views and give your opinion 44
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent on consumer goods in 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...er 400,000 compared to 300,000. Moreover,in UK, the spending on cameras was over d...
^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...000 compared to 300,000. Moreover,in UK, the spending on cameras was over double ...
^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... remaining cosumer goods was spent money by Franch more than by British. The cons...
^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stood at 200,000 while at sightly under 150,000 in UK.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, whereas, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55140445525 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5312901583 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154678916806 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071557548047 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632819498181 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116579368818 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543677225569 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.