The bar chart illustrates the proportion of both sexes qualifing a high eduction between 2001 and 2002 in Wales and is measured by percentages.
Overall it is immediately apparent that depending on the type of certain bar there was seen marked difference among men and women.
According to the graph, males obtaining a degree or equivalent stood at almost 15 %, while the opposite sex was slight less than that of men by representing about 12 %. Following that, men witnessed the most popularity in GCE A level, which was the highest by this year, but women's percentage, again, was under twice as margine as the opposite's. Ultimately, the domination of men on this chart ended up in other qualifications, where, in comparison with the latter, the former was larger by approximately 2 %.
However, the leading of females was in three aspects as well. First of all, who received a higher education qualification was almost one in ten, whereas men represented nearly the same case. After that, women experienced the most significant outcome in GCSE grade, at well above a third and males indicated about a fifth. In terms of having no qualification, there was a similarity, by representing 20 % and 24 % respectively.
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 84
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 84
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, third, well, whereas, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06467661692 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06023976113 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681592039801 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5625452617 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.111111111 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102109501092 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445937173679 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677412973827 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816601640976 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084386705684 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.