the bar chart below shows the number of research students studying a different subject in 2005.
The graph illustrates how many research students (men and women) attended six different subjects in 2005. Overall, it is evident that natural science had the highest number of female attendance, while two subject, mathematics and psychology ware the most preferable subjects by male students.
Generally, there were two subjects, mathematics and psychology, having the biggest number of male participants (200 each). Following that was natural science, which had a similar number of the student on both sexes (200). Moreover, engineering and programming accounted for more male participants (150 each) compares to that of women (90 and 75 respectively). Lastly, linguistic was the lowest share of males attendance (around 80).
Furthermore, psychology was among the top list of the subject chosen by women students, it accounted for around 175 participants, while linguistic observed below that of psychology subject, about 115 students. In addition, mathematics noted as the lowest number of female attendance, which was just below 50 students.
- The tables below show people s reasons for giving up smoking and when they intend to give up summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 89
- Schools should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree with this statement 76
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money. government must invest this money in public services instead. to what extend do you agree with this statement? 78
- The graph and chart below give information about the number of new graduates and theiremployment in the UK from 1992 to 2002. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62420382166 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01631196256 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636942675159 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9715817318 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20097429114 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875038736093 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790498305238 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14437470066 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800167946053 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.