The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants

Given are the bar chart contrasting the number of people joining different evening classes at an adult education center in the year 2009 as well as the pie chart delineating their age d which were joining in the courses.

Perceptibly, the number of females was far higher than that of males in Language, Drama and painting, while the opposite was true for sculpture. . As information supplied from the other figure, the proportion of people over 65s accounted for was by far the highest while that of people who were was under 18 years old was the least.

Sharing a similar pattern when in the number of females doubled that of males in Language and Drama subject with 40% and 20%, meanwhile, the contrary was true for Sculpture when thatin the number of males accounted for 120 students. It is transparent that %, painting which was consisted of 30 women % and 25 in the number of women and men.

When it comes to the proportion of the people over 65s it ranked first in the number attendees with 42%., Second in terms of the participation was of the rates of the 40 to 49-year-oldsunder-20s with at 26%, followed by 16% ofThe percentage of people in their thirties twenties which was equal to the sum of the rates of those people in their twenties thirties and people aged under 20in their fourties with 11% and 5%

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar chart contrasting the number of...
^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...le the opposite was true for sculpture. . As information supplied from the other ...
^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e highest while that of people who were was under 18 years old was the least. Sh...
^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile, the contrary was true for Sculpture when thatin the number of males accounte...
^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ond in terms of the participation was of the rates of the 40 to 49-year-oldsunder...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67811158798 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6743566106 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519313304721 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.5958499805 43.030603864 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 181.666666667 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.8333333333 22.9334400587 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164608879948 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962828002367 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10575346672 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122262163667 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116431303236 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.29 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.