The bar chart below shows the numbers of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000.
The change in a number of students at a university taking Italian to be the main discipline in three different countries throughout four decades since 1960 is displayed by the bar chart.
Overall, Italian was popular year-to-year among college students in Germany. By marked contrast, the two other nations revealed that those studying this lexical subject considerably decrease.
Initially, the German collegers conceiving the Italian lecture were a very small number, being by far tremendously with Spaniard one over a quarter of a million. They in Germany, sustainably, recovered to be the highest eventually, as similar as them in Spain in 1990, more than 300,000. This contrasted with the former, the figure for the latter was to shrink, observed at the last, with only 150,000 students.
Furthermore, in 1960, there were a very large majority number of scholars in France taking Italian course at a half of a million, peaking virtually 525,000 numbers in ten years later. In 2000, The French were the least, accounting for more than a hundred thousand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-11 | mnaufalnurrahman | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | mnaufalnurrahman | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | mnaufalnurrahman | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | mnaufalnurrahman | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | mnaufalnurrahman | 84 | view |
- The graph below gives the information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 89
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000 84
- News media is more influential nowadays Some people think it is a negative development To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000 78
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive or a negative one 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80635957201 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672514619883 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7555027638 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182809421761 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713069335159 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726766716551 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117875853904 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758250644868 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.