The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000.
The chart illustrates the kilometres travelled by passenger on various transportation in the uk from 1990 to 2000.
Generally, the total of 100 billions passenger kilometres by the uk inhabitants was recorded in 1990, went up by over 10 billion in the preceded ten years, in which bus and train are the two most preference means of transport of uk citizens.
Specifically, there are roughly 42 billion and 40 billion kilometres travelled on bus and rail in 1990, but during ten years period, both figures rose slightly to 43 billion kilometres. The number of kilometres travelled by people who live in the uk in air accounted for only a modest number, at approximately 5 billion kilometres in 1990, and experiencing a small rise to nearly 7 billion in 2000.
In contrast, from 5 billion and 6 billion passenger kilometres by uk residents using bicycle and motorbike in 1990, to 4.8 billion and 5.8 billion passenger kilometres respectively in 2002.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems should we discourage pEople to use cars. 73
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone-damaging gases from 1980 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- It is said that the amount of violence on the TV programs has negative effect on our social development and therefore should be reduced.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars? 56
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems should we discourage pEople to use cars. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06289308176 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09960180469 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559748427673 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1207787202 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.0 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322099850559 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231263237671 0.103423049105 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143843163098 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263880487205 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141316028758 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.