The given bar graph compares the proportion of male and female who reside in Australia engage in physical activity regularly in terms of age categories in 2010. On the whole, the percentage underwent fluctuation in both male and female, irrespective f any age groups.
Turning to the detail, in terms of the pinnacle, the maximum number of men could be observed in the age group 15 to 24, standing at 52.8%. However, the least figure fell into the category of 35 to 44 in terms of male, with merely under 40%. Likewise, the highest statistics in the women went to the age brackets of 45 to 54, peaking at 53.3%. In contrast, the age group "65 and over" saw the minimal number of female, at around 47.1%.
The most striking point is that the similarity in the chart could be observed in the people who aged 65 and over, with 46.7% in male and 47.1% in female. Moreover, the yawning gap befell 35 to 44-year-old people, with 13% of gap.
- Some people think the government should spend money on technology while the others think it should be for free education. Discuss both views and give your idea. 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The age of information technology has taken a lot of people surprise While it has become a way of life for some others know very litle about it and may be unlikely to learn eventually we will have a polarised society and this will lead to serious social 87
- The charts show the percentage of power generated from 6 different types in Gareline 69
- Countries（where there is high unemployment）most pupils should be offered only primary education, there is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, moreover, in contrast, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59411764706 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51831354565 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9259623827 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213173748956 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833408765651 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735143808079 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139134766124 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734968891976 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.