The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010

The bar graph compares the proportion of both sexes who did regular exercise in Australia in 2010. the data is calibrated in percentage.

Overall, it can be observed from the chart that regular exercise was significant popular almost among all age groups in females accept to 15 to 24 age group where males dominated as well as senior citizens shared a equal proportion in this activity.

It is witnessed from the bar graph that, regarding three age groups, 35 to 44, 45 to 54 and 55 to 64, daily physical activity was most popular among females which was comprised over fifty percent, 52.5%,53.3% and 53% respectively as well as men contributed only below than 45% in all same age groups. In contrast, over 65 age groups shared equal percentage with almost 47%.

Further scrutinizing bar graph, doing regular exercise was significant acitivity among the youngsters ( age groups 15 to 24) which was accounted for over 50% which was about 6% more as opposed to females. However, 48.9% women had been registered whereas, 42.2% was men observed by 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... regular exercise in Australia in 2010. the data is calibrated in percentage. Ov...
^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...regular exercise was significant popular almost among all age groups in females a...
^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nated as well as senior citizens shared a equal proportion in this activity. I...
^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ed equal percentage with almost 47%. Further scrutinizing bar graph, doing regular e...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificant acitivity among the youngsters age groups 15 to 24 which was accounted ...
^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ed for over 50% which was about 6% more as opposed to females. However, 48.9% wome...
^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d been registered whereas, 42.2% was men observed by 2010.
^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istered whereas, 42.2% was men observed by 2010.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94943820225 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6606032199 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634831460674 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.5344528906 43.030603864 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275443605316 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117316933798 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596262928631 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159457111713 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022907074454 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.